Introduction
related attorneys
An attempt is being made in Maryland to kick start some 13,000 asbestos cases that had been set aside by the courts. Fighting through a bottleneck of cases would be a victory in this case, as it’s too often a battle just to get a plaintiff’s day in court.
The effort, as our mesothelioma lawyers understand it, involves a proposal to have a number of those old cases lumped together based on similarities. These are cases that were previously put on the back burner because plaintiffs alleged asbestos exposure, but not sickness. Plaintiff attorneys say many of those individuals have since fallen ill, and now hope to have their cases heard together. It may ultimately reduce the damages per litigant, but it would ensure their cases could be heard sometime in the next decade, and the grouping would likely bolster their chances of a win.
The Baltimore Circuit Court has yet to rule on the proposal. However, the action is being sharply contested by defendant lawyers for allegedly bypassing certain due process procedures in an effort they contend is intended to pressure them into resolving potentially weaker cases.
Baltimore was one of the first cities to establish a two-tiered, priority system to address the flood of mesothelioma and asbestos cases, and whatever resulting decision is made could have a potential impact on other cities that followed Baltimore’s lead.
To better understand what’s happening in Baltimore, we have to understand the environment in which the two-tiered priority system was established. Back in the late 1980s and early 1990s, we were just beginning to see a massive influx of asbestos litigation.
The reason for this timing was because use of the material – long known to pose deadly health hazards to those who breathed in the fibers – dropped off significantly by the end of the 1970s. Prior to that, it was a very common component of many items – from car parts to home roofing. But sickness from asbestos exposure – either in the form of mesothelioma or asbestosis – does not become apparent until many decades later. So by the late 1980s and 1990s, we were beginning to see cases from individuals who had been exposed in the ’30s, ’40s and ’50s.
During this time, there was also an increased awareness of what was making these people sick, as well as understanding that many of these individuals and their families deserved to be compensated for that exposure.
Consolidating those cases in order to aid the court in moving forward makes a lot of sense. In fact, if taken individually, these cases could potentially take three to four decades before all are heard. That is time asbestos illness sufferers don’t have.
The two-tiered system was a way for the courts to give the sickest plaintiffs priority. This made sense too, but it also all but guarantees that some cases won’t get heard at all. In fact, cases from the “back burner docket” are only heard at a rate of a few each year. And many of those people have since grown ill or even passed away.
Ultimately, it will come down to which plan the judge believes will work best in resolving the most cases, while still preserving the integrity of the justice system.
Frequently Asked Questions: Mesothelioma & Asbestos
Featured Articles
our attorneys
Client Experiences
When individuals and families face the challenges of mesothelioma and asbestos exposure—coping with complex treatments, escalating costs, and emotional strain—they turn to Ferraro Law for clarity, guidance, and steadfast support. Through meticulous case preparation, empathetic counsel, and strategic representation, our attorneys build compelling cases that secure meaningful settlements to cover medical expenses, provide financial relief, and offer a path toward stability during difficult times.
5 Stars!! Berta, I want you to know you have the patience of a saint. It is not easy working with the public. I know firsthand. You take your time to explain so that the person understands what you are saying & if there is a problem you get to the bottom of it and come up with the answer as to why – problem solved. You are professional (very). Thank you for your time & energy you spent with me. Hopefully, management will recognize your work ethics. People like you are hard to find. You are an asset to the law firm.
Wishing you all the Best,
Bernardine Brown
Bernadine B.

5 Stars, I have been a client of The Ferraro law Firm for 24 years and everyone has been very helpful. When I had a question, it was answered promptly and without all the legalese. I would recommend the Ferraro Law Firm and attorney Jose Becerra because the entire team has been caring and professional. For many years, Nestor has been one of the best workers The Ferraro Law Firm has.
Lynn
5 STARS Thank God for the Ferraro Law firm. Every time I call to speak with my Attorney, Marc Kunen, he and his assistants are always helpful and take the time to answer my questions. I highly recommend The Ferraro Law Firm. The Ferraro Law Firm is the mouthpiece for those of us who need help.
Reverend Henry
My father passed away from mesothelioma and The Ferraro Law Firm has been there for me and my family for over 10 years. Our attorney, Aleksandra Sikorska, and Nestor in the settlements department will get the job done and are very kind and compassionate.
Michelle
Free Case Consultation
Our Trial and Appellate Attorneys Are Ready to Fight for You
If you were seriously injured, remember that it is crucial to choose the right law firm to represent your interests. We have been doing this for more than three decades, and have the resources you need to challenge any opponent!
Free Consultation








Disclaimer: The information on this website and our social media channels is for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship.