Read Blog
related attorneys
Related practice area
Herbicides that contain the toxic chemical Paraquat—like Gramoxone, Parazone, and Blanco—have been banned by the European Union, China, and Brazil because of their dangerous link to Parkinson’s disease. America has not only failed to ban Paraquat but has doubled its use between 2006 and 2016, despite multiple studies highlighting its dangerous side effects. On average, 8 million pounds of Paraquat is sprayed every year on corn, soybeans, wheat, and other crops throughout America.
Agricultural workers and consumer activists are saying enough is enough, and are demanding that manufacturers are held accountable for producing and selling such a dangerous chemical. Numerous organizations, including the Michael J. Fox Foundation, have also urged Congress to pass legislation that would force the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to ban the herbicide.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and later were diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease, schedule a free legal consultation with The Ferraro Law Firm. You may be entitled to compensation for your medical expenses and similar losses.
Which Herbicides Contain Paraquat?
Paraquat is found in many herbicides. The following are the brand names of weed killers that contain Paraquat:
- Blanco
- Bonfire
- Cyclone
- Devour
- Firestorm
- Gramoxone
- Helmquat
- Parazone
- Para-SHOT
- Quik-Quat
- VECOL
Research Shows Link Between Paraquat and Parkinson’s Disease
Over the last decade, multiple studies have shown that exposure to Paraquat significantly increases the risk of developing Parkinson’s disease.
As early as 2009, a scientific study in The American Journal of Epidemiology reported that if Paraquat was sprayed within 550 yards of a home, the chances of residents developing Parkinson’s disease increased by an astounding 75 percent.
Since that early study, multiple reports have reported similar findings. In 2011, a National Institute of Health study found that agricultural workers were 2.5 times more likely to be diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease if they used and were exposed to Paraquat. Even more concerning, a study published the following year by the Genetic Modification Association found that some individuals that had particular genetic modifications were 11 times more likely to be diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease if they were exposed to Paraquat.
What is even more telling is that research has shown that the toxic herbicide produces a reaction in the body that is linked to Parkinson’s disease. Scientists found that in individuals who were exposed to Paraquat, the chemical killed some of their cells through oxidative stress, a reaction that is also found in patients with Parkinson’s disease.
These alarming findings have spurred countries around the world to ban the use of Paraquat. But in America, the dangerous herbicide is still used to this day by agricultural workers.

Activists Urge Congress to Ban Paraquat in the U.S.
Despite dozens of countries around the world banning Paraquat, including the United Kingdom, China, Brazil, and the European Union, Paraquat can still be applied to U.S. crops.
Currently, Paraquat is a restricted herbicide, which means that the average consumer cannot purchase it for their personal use in residential gardens. Instead, it is purchased by commercial farmers who have a special license to apply it.
These restrictions, however, do not protect the agricultural laborers who sprays and is exposed to Paraquat every day. Nor does it protect those who live in agricultural areas near large farms where Paraquat is applied.
In 2019, U.S. Rep. Nydia Velázquez introduced H.R.3817: the Protect Against Paraquat Act. If passed, the bill would have required the U.S. EPA to prohibit the sale and use of Paraquat.
In 2020, Senator Tom Udall and Representative Joe Neguse introduced a more expansive bill in the U.S. Senate called the Protect America’s Children from Toxic Pesticides Act of 2020. This bill also called for a ban on Paraquat, but it was never voted on.
U.S. EPA Approves Paraquat Again Despite Research Linking the Herbicide to Parkinson’s
Despite these attempts by members of Congress, in October of 2019, the EPA discounted research showing the link between Paraquat and Parkinson’s disease after exposure.
The following year, the EPA approved Paraquat again, despite groups like the Michael J. Fox Foundation urging them not to. The foundation had submitted a petition with more than 107,000 signatures from members of the community urging the agency to ban the harmful herbicide.
The EPA approval did come, however, with additional restrictions on usage and application, including prohibiting aerial application in most cases. However, given the serious health risks, complications and threats to the agricultural workers, activists believe the restrictions are not enough to protect public health from long-term exposure.
Dozens of Paraquat Lawsuits Filed by Agricultural Workers With Parkinson’s Disease
More than 70 farmers and agricultural laborers have filed lawsuits against Paraquat manufacturers and distributors, including Syngenta and Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. Syngenta manufactures the Paraquat-containing herbicide Gramoxone, and Chevron sells and distributes Gramoxone in the United States.
Plaintiffs were all diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease after being exposed to Paraquat. Lawsuits allege that Syngenta and Chevron continued to manufacture and sell the harmful herbicide despite knowing the damaging effects on human health and Paraquat’s link to Parkinson’s disease.
In June 2021, it was announced that Paraquat lawsuits would be consolidated in a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Southern District of Illinois. Consolidation allows injured agricultural workers and their legal teams to share evidence throughout the discovery process. Since one judge will be overseeing the litigation, U.S. Judge Nancy Rosenstengel, it will ensure consistent pre-trial rulings.
The Ferraro Law Firm: Standing Up to Big Chemical Corporations Since 1985
If you have been exposed to a Paraquat-containing herbicide (including Gramoxone, Helmquat, Parazone, Para-SHOT, or Quik-Quat) and were later diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease, you may qualify to file a Paraquat lawsuit. A Paraquat lawsuit can help you recover compensation for your medical expenses, loss of wages if you are unable to work, pain and suffering, and more.
The toxic tort attorneys at The Ferraro Law Firm have obtained justice against some of the largest chemical manufacturers in the country for producing and selling harmful products. Our founder, James Ferraro, Sr., obtained a $4 million verdict against DuPont for a fungicide that harmed a pregnant mother’s baby, causing the infant to be born without eyes.
If you believe you or a loved one may qualify for a Paraquat lawsuit, contact us today to schedule a free legal consultation. Our law firm has the skills and resources to hold the manufacturers accountable for the harm you may have suffered.
Featured Articles
our attorneys
James L. Ferraro
Founding Shareholder & President
Marc P. Kunen
Shareholder
James L. Ferraro, Jr.
Shareholder
Andrew J. Ferraro
Litigation Attorney
Angelica L. Novick
Partner
Daniel J. Di Matteo
Partner
The Hon. Leslie Rothenberg (Ret.)
Partner
Ignacio J. Segurola
Litigation Attorney
Client Experiences
When individuals and families face the challenges of mesothelioma and asbestos exposure—coping with complex treatments, escalating costs, and emotional strain—they turn to Ferraro Law for clarity, guidance, and steadfast support. Through meticulous case preparation, empathetic counsel, and strategic representation, our attorneys build compelling cases that secure meaningful settlements to cover medical expenses, provide financial relief, and offer a path toward stability during difficult times.
Stephanie and all the folks at the Ferraro Law Firm were professional and excellent in handling my case. Even more importantly they were very kind and treated me like family. I would wholeheartedly recommend them to anyone. Thank Y’all so much.
Matthew F.
Working with Daniel J. Di Matteo, Attorney and Partner at The Ferraro Law Firm was and is a life-changing forever experience. He is committed to a level of professionalism and attention to detail that is at the 100th percentile. Daniel handled everything with calmness, sensitivity and support that I needed through this difficult time. He always protected me and had my best interests. I am completely satisfied with the results.
If you need an attorney that operates at the highest level, that attorney is Daniel J. Di Matteo.
Harvey W.
Ferraro Law is wonderful and I am forever grateful to them. My attorney Daniel Di Matteo fought like a tiger for me against a multibillion dollar corporation and obtained a substantial settlement for me. This settlement is life changing for me. If you need an attorney call Ferraro Law and if you’re lucky Daniel will take your case.
Florence T.
Not too long ago I picked up the phone and called the Ferraro Law Firm not quite knowing what to expect. From the moment I reached out, the team made me feel heard and taken care of — not just like another case walking through the door.
Nikki Hurtado was my first primary contact. After speaking with her I knew that I had picked the right firm. She walked me through the process in plain understandable language. Even after numerous calls, she never made me feel like I was asking too many questions, and I always felt confident that my case was in expert hands.
My litigator was Daniel Di Matteo. If there was ever anyone that you would want by your side in a court of law, it would be him. He was everything that you would want in an attorney—calm, cool, always prepared, communicative and most importantly–experienced. He knew everything that was going to happen before it occurred but was prepared for any contingency. He is a fantastic attorney.
What really set them apart was their communication. I was kept informed at every stage — no chasing down updates, no wondering what was happening with my case. Calls and emails were returned promptly, and they proactively reached out whenever there was a development.
The professionalism of the entire team — from the attorneys to the support staff — was exceptional. Everyone I interacted with was kind, compassionate, and genuinely invested in my well-being, not just the outcome of my case.
And the outcome? Better than I could have hoped for. They fought hard on my behalf and secured a result that truly reflected the impact this injury had on my life.
You could ask for no better firm or attorney.
Keeth K.
Free Case Consultation
Our Trial and Appellate Attorneys Are Ready to Fight for You
If you were seriously injured, remember that it is crucial to choose the right law firm to represent your interests. We have been doing this for more than 40 years, and have the resources you need to challenge any opponent!