Read Blog
related attorneys
To succeed in an asbestos exposure case, the plaintiff must prove that asbestos attributable to the defendant was a cause of the plaintiff’s injury. Causation in asbestos cases can be complex, with defendants often arguing that the plaintiff cannot prove that he or she was specifically exposed to sufficient asbestos from the defendant to cause the injury.
The Southern District of Illinois recently considered the issue of causation in Watts v. 84 Lumber Company. The plaintiff in Watts had worked aboard ships in the Navy. His job included replacing gaskets on valves, pumps, and boilers. The plaintiff testified that he replaced flange gaskets hundreds of times, using replacements from three manufacturers, including Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. After contracting lung cancer, the plaintiff filed suit against a number of defendants, including Goodyear. Goodyear moved for summary judgment.
The plaintiff testified that he used a scraper or chisel to remove the old dry and cracked gaskets, creating dust. Sometimes he used prefabricated replacement gaskets, and sometimes sheet gaskets that he would have to cut from a sheet. The plaintiff testified that there was always dust in the packaging for the prefabricated gaskets. Cutting the sheet gaskets also created asbestos dust.
To determine causation, the court looked to a Supreme Court of Illinois case, Thacker v. UNR Industries, Inc. Thacker requires a plaintiff to show that he worked regularly in an area where asbestos from the defendant was frequently used, and he worked sufficiently close to the area to come in contact with the defendant’s product. The plaintiff must meet this “frequency, regularity and proximity test” to be able to present the question of legal causation to the jury.
The defendant argued that there was not any evidence the plaintiff worked around or with its products containing asbestos. The plaintiff had stated that he had used gaskets manufactured by Goodyear. He said he had replaced large numbers of gaskets, and doing so created dust that he inhaled. The plaintiff had engaged in this work regularly for about three years. There were records that the defendant’s products were on Navy ships up to 1973. The plaintiff had established sufficient issues of material fact to allow the case to move forward.
Causation can sometimes be difficult to prove in asbestos exposure cases. Our mesothelioma attorneys know how to investigate a case to find information to support the case against the defendants.
Help for mesothelioma victims can be found at The Ferraro Law Firm by calling (888) 554-2030. Offices in Miami and Washington, D.C.
Additional Resources:
Watts v. 84 Lumber Company, January 28, 2016, United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
More Blog Entries:
Proving Damages in California Asbestos Cases- Soto v. Bargwarner Morse Tec Inc., December 22, 2015, Miami Asbestos Injury Lawyer Blog
Featured Articles
our attorneys
Client Experiences
When individuals and families face the challenges of mesothelioma and asbestos exposure—coping with complex treatments, escalating costs, and emotional strain—they turn to Ferraro Law for clarity, guidance, and steadfast support. Through meticulous case preparation, empathetic counsel, and strategic representation, our attorneys build compelling cases that secure meaningful settlements to cover medical expenses, provide financial relief, and offer a path toward stability during difficult times.
To the general public searching for a competent aggressive law firm, I must recommend The Ferraro Law firm. After my first consultation with this firm, it was clear this was the right firm to handle my case.
I had tried a few others but was not impressed. In fact, the others made me feel like just a number. I’m a licensed general contractor with many years of experience. The main thing in my business success is, and has been, communication.
Ferraro Law has given me the very best communication I could ask for. As we all know, things don’t always happen overnight. This is where communication comes in.
My thanks to the Ferraro Law firm for transparency and diligent attention to all the details in my case.
I recommend them highly with a five star rating. 10 if I could.
Mark D.
I had a truly positive experience working with Ferraro Law Firm, especially Berta, who supported me every step of the way. From the beginning, she was kind, patient, and very clear in her communication. She set realistic expectations and checked in with me often, which made a big difference during a time that felt overwhelming in my personal life.
Receiving a settlement sounds like it should be simple, but it can actually be a lot to process. Berta made everything feel manageable. The process of signing documents and receiving my settlement was smooth and stress-free, and I always felt reassured that everything was being handled properly.
What stood out to me the most was how considerate and understanding she was of me as a person, not just a case. As a mother, that meant a lot. I truly felt supported throughout the entire experience.
I’m very grateful for the help I received and would absolutely recommend Ferraro Law Firm to anyone looking for professionalism, guidance, and genuine care during a legal process.
Ebony C.
Mrs. Berta, thank you for being the best part of Ferraro Law Firm.
Regina H.
I am very pleased with Ferraro law firm and their employee Berta. She was very helpful and she kept me informed about the entire process. I would definitely recommend this company!
Roger T.
Free Case Consultation
Our Trial and Appellate Attorneys Are Ready to Fight for You
If you were seriously injured, remember that it is crucial to choose the right law firm to represent your interests. We have been doing this for more than three decades, and have the resources you need to challenge any opponent!
