Read Blog
related attorneys
Related practice area
A defective tire that fails while a vehicle is in motion can result in a serious accident and potentially catastrophic injuries.
The recent case of Book v. Voma Tire Corp. involves an allegedly defective tire that resulted in serious injury. However, the case differs a bit in that the vehicle wasn’t in motion at the time of injury. Rather, it reportedly blew up on a teenager who was attempting to inflate it.
The issue before the Iowa Supreme Court, in this case, was whether a large, multi-national defendant had the right to have the case dismissed in state district court for lack of personal jurisdiction. That is, the defendant didn’t operate in the state of Iowa. It’s a Chinese company. Thus, it argued the district court didn’t have the right to hear the case.
However, the Iowa Supreme Court disagreed, allowing this defective tire product liability claim to move forward in state court.
According to court records, the victim was 17 at the time of the incident, son of an owner/operator of an auto repair shop. He worked part-time for his father through an apprentice program at his high school.
The teen’s father agreed to mount a new set of tires for a customer’s horse trailer. The tires were purchased from a local retailer, but they were made in China. The father had trouble getting one of the tires to seat properly on the rim, but he didn’t realize he was attempting to mount a 16-inch tire to an older-model 16.5-inch rim (apparently, a common mistake). He was distracted by a phone call and walked away from the rim. The tire was under-inflated.
The teen then walked in with a co-worker and, without first talking to his father, started to air up the tire.
The tire exploded. The teen suffered severe injuries. He was permanently blinded in one eye. He lost a huge part of his jaw. His sense of taste and smell was gone. He now has only partial use of his left arm and hand. He has endured numerous treatments and therapies by a dozen different medical specialists.
The teen’s mother filed a product liability action on her son’s behalf, seeking damages for her son’s personal injuries and medical expenses, as well as her loss of consortium.
A number of defendants were named, including the company that designed/sold the machine used to mount and inflate the tire, the wholesaler that sold the tire and the Chinese-based manufacturer of the tire. Additional defendants were later added.
The Chinese manufacturer filed a motion to dismiss based on lack of personal jurisdiction. The company manufactured more than 3 million tires just in the nine months preceding this incident. The firm has no offices or employees in the U.S. and it doesn’t advertise here.
The importer of those tires, also a named defendant, is based in Tennessee. It provided the specifications for tires ordered and purchased 180,000 of them in late 2009. Of those, nearly 17,000 went to the distributor in Iowa, where the one in question was purchased.
Trial court granted the defense motion to dismiss, finding that because defendant didn’t operate in Iowa, state courts did not have jurisdiction.
State supreme court reversed. The defendant is a large, high-volume manufacturer selling to a national market. The court ruled personal jurisdiction was established based on the company’s direct shipments to the state of Iowa and indirect shipments of hundreds of thousands more tires to the state via an American-based distributor – including the one involved in this workplace injury.
The Ferraro Law Firm handles claims resulting from defective products or dangerous pharmaceuticals. Call (888) 554-2030 for a free and confidential consultation. Offices in Miami and Washington, D.C.
Additional Resources:
Book v. Voma Tire Corp., March 6, 2015, Iowa Supreme Court
More Blog Entries:
Confidential Airbag Settlements Seal Information Relevant to New Plaintiffs, Dec. 14, 2014, Florida Product Liability Lawyer Blog
Featured Articles
our attorneys
Client Experiences
When individuals and families face the challenges of mesothelioma and asbestos exposure—coping with complex treatments, escalating costs, and emotional strain—they turn to Ferraro Law for clarity, guidance, and steadfast support. Through meticulous case preparation, empathetic counsel, and strategic representation, our attorneys build compelling cases that secure meaningful settlements to cover medical expenses, provide financial relief, and offer a path toward stability during difficult times.
Working with Daniel J. Di Matteo, Attorney and Partner at The Ferraro Law Firm was and is a life-changing forever experience. He is committed to a level of professionalism and attention to detail that is at the 100th percentile. Daniel handled everything with calmness, sensitivity and support that I needed through this difficult time. He always protected me and had my best interests. I am completely satisfied with the results.
If you need an attorney that operates at the highest level, that attorney is Daniel J. Di Matteo.
Harvey W.
Ferraro Law is wonderful and I am forever grateful to them. My attorney Daniel Di Matteo fought like a tiger for me against a multibillion dollar corporation and obtained a substantial settlement for me. This settlement is life changing for me. If you need an attorney call Ferraro Law and if you’re lucky Daniel will take your case.
Florence T.
Not too long ago I picked up the phone and called the Ferraro Law Firm not quite knowing what to expect. From the moment I reached out, the team made me feel heard and taken care of — not just like another case walking through the door.
Nikki Hurtado was my first primary contact. After speaking with her I knew that I had picked the right firm. She walked me through the process in plain understandable language. Even after numerous calls, she never made me feel like I was asking too many questions, and I always felt confident that my case was in expert hands.
My litigator was Daniel Di Matteo. If there was ever anyone that you would want by your side in a court of law, it would be him. He was everything that you would want in an attorney—calm, cool, always prepared, communicative and most importantly–experienced. He knew everything that was going to happen before it occurred but was prepared for any contingency. He is a fantastic attorney.
What really set them apart was their communication. I was kept informed at every stage — no chasing down updates, no wondering what was happening with my case. Calls and emails were returned promptly, and they proactively reached out whenever there was a development.
The professionalism of the entire team — from the attorneys to the support staff — was exceptional. Everyone I interacted with was kind, compassionate, and genuinely invested in my well-being, not just the outcome of my case.
And the outcome? Better than I could have hoped for. They fought hard on my behalf and secured a result that truly reflected the impact this injury had on my life.
You could ask for no better firm or attorney.
Keeth K.
Working with my attorney, Daniel J. Di Matteo was an exceptional experience from start to finish. His level of professionalism, attention to detail, and strategic thinking set him apart immediately. Every step of the process was handled with precision and clarity, and I always felt informed and confident in the decisions being made.
What truly stood out was his ability to navigate complex situations with confidence and deliver results that exceeded my expectations. He was not only highly knowledgeable but also genuinely committed to protecting my best interests.
If you’re looking for an attorney who is sharp, responsive, and truly operates at a high level, I highly recommend him without any hesitation.
Ivan M.
Free Case Consultation
Our Trial and Appellate Attorneys Are Ready to Fight for You
If you were seriously injured, remember that it is crucial to choose the right law firm to represent your interests. We have been doing this for more than 40 years, and have the resources you need to challenge any opponent!
