Read Blog
related attorneys
Related practice area
CBS Corporation, a machine manufacturer who used to supply asbestos-laden turbines to the U.S. Navy, is seeking immunity in a mesothelioma case, arguing that it was acting under federal authority.
Plaintiff mesothelioma lawyers in Ruppel v. CBS Corp. counter that they are simply alleging a failure to warn – something the Department of Defense would not have impeded, even if the company were acting under the direction of federal authority.
Our mesothelioma lawyers understand that part of the defense tactic has involved trying to keep the case in federal court, appealing even after a federal judge stripped himself of authority and remanded the case back to state court.
However, a three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Illinois has determined that the defendant meets all criteria necessary to be considered for immunity.
The plaintiff in this case is still suing several dozen others for his mesothelioma diagnosis, so he may still have a good shot at recovering damages. However, this case sets a troubling precedent for former members of the military who have been diagnosed with mesothelioma. It makes it all the more critical for plaintiffs to hire a skilled attorney.
The plaintiff here alleges that he developed mesothelioma as a result of his exposure to asbestos while serving in the Navy between 1946 and 1954 and then later when he worked on an aircraft carrier as a civilian employee between 1957 and 1971. His complaint against CBS, formerly Westinghouse Corporation, was initially filed in state court, but the company made a successful argument to have it moved to the U.S. District Court under the federal officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C. 1442(a)(1). This law says that certain lawsuits may be moved to federal court if the defendant was acting under a federal officer and has a colorful (or genuine) federal defense.
The plaintiff moved to have the case remanded, and the U.S. District judge did so, without giving the company a chance to respond. (Local rule provided the company 30 days to respond, but the judge made his ruling just nine days later.) The judge reasoned that the plaintiff was suing on the grounds of failure to warn about the dangers of asbestos – for which there is no federal defense.
However, the appellate court reversed that order based on several factors. The first is that while the plaintiff does mention failure to warn in his complaint, the actual issue is CBS’ duties to the Navy – not its failure to warn those who came in contact with the asbestos-containing material. The appellate court also found that the company does have a valid legal argument in claiming immunity as a federal contractor.
This wouldn’t necessarily apply to all cases, but the defense is saying that the Navy demanded the products be made with asbestos, despite knowing the dangers. One former manager of the company testified that the Navy “explicitly required asbestos” in its turbines, which would have made it impossible for the company to comply with both the Navy and state tort law.
Additional Resources:
Immunity May Save CBS in Federal Asbestos Case, Dec. 5, 2012, By William Dotinga, Courthouse News Service
More Blog Entries:
Mack v. General Electric Ruling Could Impact Future Mesothelioma Cases, Nov. 8, 2012, Plaintiff Mesothelioma Lawyer Blog
Featured Articles
our attorneys
James L. Ferraro
Founding Shareholder & President
Marc P. Kunen
Shareholder
James L. Ferraro, Jr.
Shareholder
Andrew J. Ferraro
Litigation Attorney
Angelica L. Novick
Partner
Daniel J. Di Matteo
Partner
The Hon. Leslie Rothenberg (Ret.)
Partner
Ignacio J. Segurola
Litigation Attorney
Client Experiences
When individuals and families face the challenges of mesothelioma and asbestos exposure—coping with complex treatments, escalating costs, and emotional strain—they turn to Ferraro Law for clarity, guidance, and steadfast support. Through meticulous case preparation, empathetic counsel, and strategic representation, our attorneys build compelling cases that secure meaningful settlements to cover medical expenses, provide financial relief, and offer a path toward stability during difficult times.
Stephanie and all the folks at the Ferraro Law Firm were professional and excellent in handling my case. Even more importantly they were very kind and treated me like family. I would wholeheartedly recommend them to anyone. Thank Y’all so much.
Matthew F.
Working with Daniel J. Di Matteo, Attorney and Partner at The Ferraro Law Firm was and is a life-changing forever experience. He is committed to a level of professionalism and attention to detail that is at the 100th percentile. Daniel handled everything with calmness, sensitivity and support that I needed through this difficult time. He always protected me and had my best interests. I am completely satisfied with the results.
If you need an attorney that operates at the highest level, that attorney is Daniel J. Di Matteo.
Harvey W.
Ferraro Law is wonderful and I am forever grateful to them. My attorney Daniel Di Matteo fought like a tiger for me against a multibillion dollar corporation and obtained a substantial settlement for me. This settlement is life changing for me. If you need an attorney call Ferraro Law and if you’re lucky Daniel will take your case.
Florence T.
Not too long ago I picked up the phone and called the Ferraro Law Firm not quite knowing what to expect. From the moment I reached out, the team made me feel heard and taken care of — not just like another case walking through the door.
Nikki Hurtado was my first primary contact. After speaking with her I knew that I had picked the right firm. She walked me through the process in plain understandable language. Even after numerous calls, she never made me feel like I was asking too many questions, and I always felt confident that my case was in expert hands.
My litigator was Daniel Di Matteo. If there was ever anyone that you would want by your side in a court of law, it would be him. He was everything that you would want in an attorney—calm, cool, always prepared, communicative and most importantly–experienced. He knew everything that was going to happen before it occurred but was prepared for any contingency. He is a fantastic attorney.
What really set them apart was their communication. I was kept informed at every stage — no chasing down updates, no wondering what was happening with my case. Calls and emails were returned promptly, and they proactively reached out whenever there was a development.
The professionalism of the entire team — from the attorneys to the support staff — was exceptional. Everyone I interacted with was kind, compassionate, and genuinely invested in my well-being, not just the outcome of my case.
And the outcome? Better than I could have hoped for. They fought hard on my behalf and secured a result that truly reflected the impact this injury had on my life.
You could ask for no better firm or attorney.
Keeth K.
Free Case Consultation
Our Trial and Appellate Attorneys Are Ready to Fight for You
If you were seriously injured, remember that it is crucial to choose the right law firm to represent your interests. We have been doing this for more than 40 years, and have the resources you need to challenge any opponent!
