Read Blog
related attorneys
Related practice area
Two New Yorkers – including a former pro-football player – are facing federal criminal charges accusing them of numerous violations of the Clean Air Act, relating to three projects in which they are accused of improperly handling asbestos.
Our mesothelioma attorneys understand that the charges they face carry a maximum of 20 years in prison and a fine of $250,000.
Now, on the surface, it would hardly seem fair that a poor job on a construction might warrant a 20-year prison sentence. But it makes a lot more sense when you consider that it will probably take at least that long to know whether their actions in exposing others to asbestos may have resulted in a fatal mesothelioma diagnosis.
Mesothelioma, which is a cancer of the lining of internal organs, is caused by airborne asbestos and is not typically detected until decades after the initial exposure. This case is indicative of a phenomenon that we’ve seen in recent years. In far too many cases, contractors improperly remove asbestos, exposing employees and innocent bystanders to risk. In other cases, asbestos removal companies are cutting corners, not properly handling or disposing of asbestos, and likewise exposing victims to undue risk.
While asbestos isn’t formally banned in the U.S., there are strict regulations on how it must be handled. Still, criminal prosecution for violations are relatively rare.
The majority of mesothelioma litigation focuses on a monetary award or settlement. The executives and CEOs of the companies that sickened hundreds of thousands of people back in the 1950s, 60s and 70s will likely never see a day in prison. But these companies are only now facing the liability, when victims are diagnosed decades after exposure.
According to the U.S. Justice Department Press release:
Sean P. Doctor, a former Buffalo Bills fullback, and Raj Chopra, both of Grand Island, N.Y., owned two companies – S.D. Specialty Services, LLC and Comprehensive Employee Management Inc.
From the summer of 2009 to the spring of 2011, prosecutors say the two conspired to defraud the Environmental Protection Agency, as well as violate the Clean Air Act, by using a 40-yard closed container in the 1800 block of Love Road to improperly transport and keep asbestos waste material.
Specifically, the two oversaw the transportation of asbestos from various cites to the waste container, where other asbestos waste was contained. None of this was done properly or in accordance with specific guidelines set forth by the Clean Air Act, according to the allegations.
Why wouldn’t they comply with the law?
In short, it’s cheaper – the same reason so many other companies continued to use asbestos products long after they knew it was harmful to their workers and consumers.
In addition to these actions, the two are also accused of committing insurance fraud by failing to properly classify workers as being employed to handle asbestos waste. The reason they would do this is because by classifying these employees as clerical workers, as opposed to asbestos removal workers, they could pay reduced insurance premiums. Ultimately, this resulted in a savings to the companies of about $195,000.
Doctor and the company are accused of conducting numerous asbestos abatement projects – one for a park shelter in the City of Buffalo and several more for vacant homes on Grant Street – for which he did not follow proper procedure.
The two were indicted after a multi-agency investigation that involved the EPA’s criminal division, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Police, the New York State Department of Labor and the Asbestos Control Bureau.
Specifically, the two are charged with:
- Conspiracy to defraud the U.S. and violate the Clean Air Act;
- Conspiracy to commit mail fraud;
- Substantive counts of mail fraud.
Additional Resources:
TWO INDIVIDUALS AND TWO CORPORATIONS INDICTED ON CHARGES RELATED TO VIOLATIONS OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT & MAIL FRAUD, Sept. 27, 2012, Press Release, Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney William J. Hochul, Jr., Western District of New York
More Blog Entries:
Delay Tactics of Mesothelioma Defendants Prove Ineffective, Aug. 30, 2012, Mesothelioma Lawyers Blog
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
01.
How long do I have to file a claim?
The statute of limitations varies by state and case type, so it’s essential to consult an attorney promptly to preserve your right to file a claim. In Florida, the statute of limitations for personal injury cases, including toxic exposure claims, is typically two years from the date of injury or discovery of harm.
02.
Can I file a lawsuit if I don’t live near the exposure site anymore?
Yes, you may still have a claim. Jurisdiction often depends on where the exposure occurred or where the responsible party operates. An attorney can help determine the appropriate venue for your case.
03.
What evidence is needed for a toxic exposure case?
Key evidence includes medical records, environmental reports, exposure documentation, and expert testimony to establish a connection between the harmful substance and your condition.
04.
What damages can I recover in a toxic exposure case?
You may be eligible to recover economic damages (such as medical expenses and lost wages) and non-economic damages (such as pain and suffering or emotional distress). In some cases, punitive damages may also be pursued.
05.
Do I need to prove exactly when and where I was exposed?
While precise details can strengthen your case, experienced attorneys can often identify exposure sources through records, work history, or environmental data, even if you don’t have all the specifics.
06.
Can Ferraro Law represent me if I live outside of Florida?
Yes, we represent clients across the nation and work with local counsel when necessary. With extensive experience in handling complex litigation and specialized claims, we are well-equipped to advocate for your rights regardless of your location.
have more questions?
Featured Articles
our attorneys
Client Experiences
When individuals and families face the challenges of mesothelioma and asbestos exposure—coping with complex treatments, escalating costs, and emotional strain—they turn to Ferraro Law for clarity, guidance, and steadfast support. Through meticulous case preparation, empathetic counsel, and strategic representation, our attorneys build compelling cases that secure meaningful settlements to cover medical expenses, provide financial relief, and offer a path toward stability during difficult times.
This post is directed on the care and understanding that I was shown by Bertha(Berta) on my recent claims. She has great understanding of the process and I received great timely help from her.
Faith G.
I had a great experience working with Ignacio at this firm on my insurance claim after a car accident. He handled everything professionally and on time. He took care of the details and saved me a lot of time and effort. The claim was successfully resolved, and I received my payout. I’m very satisfied with his work and highly recommend Ignacio and the firm.
Anton T.
I had an excellent experience working with Ignacio Segurola at The Ferraro Law Firm, P.A. From the very beginning, Ignacio was professional, knowledgeable, responsive, and genuinely caring. He took the time to listen carefully, explain everything clearly, and make sure I understood each step of the process. Thank you, Ignacio!
Mariana R.
Stephanie and all the folks at the Ferraro Law Firm were professional and excellent in handling my case. Even more importantly they were very kind and treated me like family. I would wholeheartedly recommend them to anyone. Thank Y’all so much.
Matthew F.
Free Case Consultation
Our Trial and Appellate Attorneys Are Ready to Fight for You
If you were seriously injured, remember that it is crucial to choose the right law firm to represent your interests. We have been doing this for more than 40 years, and have the resources you need to challenge any opponent!
